Filed under: Art + Religion, Science + Tech, Society + Media | Tags: Apple, Arthur C. Clarke, Childhood's End, Did you know?, Enlightenment, environment, facebook, Google, grok, information, internet, knowledge, media, new media, Robert Heinlein, singularity, technology, web 2.0, world wide web, Zen Buddhism
What is this thing we call the Internet?
No, really. What is it?
We use it every day. Networking sites like Facebook let people access anyone, anywhere, in seconds. Google sorts and organizes more words and ideas in a minute than any human can hope to process in her life. Dazzling fortunes are made, used and wasted; overwhelming games and images are developed and stored; trillions of stories are told.
This thing, this Internet, didn’t even exist 30 years ago. Now, it permeates our media environment. It is the purest manifestation of Enlightenment humanism, an endless library of human knowledge. Anything and everything mankind has known and recorded probably waits in there like an apple in the Garden, waiting to be plucked and digested by some enterprising individual. It is collective human consciousness, literally resting in the palm of your hand.
Watch this video. You’ll like it.
Internet breakthroughs, like all technology, advance exponentially. Where is this all leading us?
Some, such as the believers in the Singularity, would say knowledge and resultant technology are advancing to an impossible point where all knowledge will unite in a single ego, and individuality will cease (like at the end of Arthur C. Clarke’s Childhood’s End.) Admittedly, the idea is a little crazy… but so is the idea that Christ died for our sins, or that Energy might equal Matter times the Speed of Light, squared. Right?
Is the Singularity what the Internet is moving us toward? Perhaps… If so, I think we’d all do well to keep our eyes on that sneaky bugger.
But then, maybe, as Zen Buddhists would tell you, all technology is insignificant. Perhaps the Internet simply is, just as a rock simply is, or a picnic lunch simply is, and the responsible human should relax, observe and contemplate it (try to grok it, to use the words of another ridiculously nerdy author for me to be referencing). After all, humans spend so much time altering their environment…
This spring break, let your environment alter you.
Justin Leverett is done for the week. Shabbat shalom, y’all 🙂
Filed under: Business + Politics, Society + Media | Tags: Afghanistan, environmental movement, executive branch, Iraq, Obama, wind energy
By himself, Obama cannot clean up the environment, stop global warming, or create a single green job.
Stop for a second and really take this statement in. It may seem obvious, but with all the demands competing for Obama’s attention, an outsider might think US citizens have forgotten the basics of US Civics 101.
Pop quiz: what is the president’s job? Between signing statements and executive orders, we may have forgotten that it’s not the president’s job to make laws but to make sure they are being followed. His job is to make sure the laws are being “executed,” hence the “executive” branch.
Today, our president is our chief economic adviser who talks with the media about spending more money that we can possibly conceptualize. But just because he isn’t a legislature, that does not mean he can’t help the environmental movement.
Take his power as commander and chief of the military. Obama has the power to bring the troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan but instead is sending 17,000 more soldiers to Afghanistan and staying at least one more year in Iraq.
The environmental damages caused by war may be obvious. But the real killer is all the money we are spending abroad when we have so many problems at home. The congressional budget office estimates that we will spend 2.6 trillion dollars fighting these wars by the end of 2010.
It all comes back to spending and what we choose to spend our money on. Look at how much we spend on defense as opposed to energy. Look at how much we spend on education compared to health care. If we taught people how to eat healthy and prevented our ground water and food supply from being contaminated, would we need to spend so much on health care years down the line? If we spend a trillion dollars on wind turbines, would we really need to fight wars over oil?
Filed under: Energy + Climate, Science + Tech, Society + Media | Tags: Galveston, green energy, Gulf of Mexico, Matt Bristow, natural gas, peak oil, renewable energy, solar, T. Boone Pickens, Texas, Wind, wind turbines
It is said that “everything is bigger in Texas.” Being the second largest state in the nation, it is a small country unto itself. The state has been renowned for it’s oil production and refinement, but that maybe about to change. Texas is helping to lead the country with green energy solutions in a big way. By 2020 the state hopes to supply 20% of it’s energy needs with renewable resources.
The people who are leading the way for these renewables are former oil tycoons, like T. Boone Pickens. He has been promoting plans to rebuild the countries energy infrastructure, using energy from solar, wind, and natural gas. Oil companies are also looking at ways to stay afloat in today’s ‘sea of green’. They are adapting their business strategies to fit better with the times, investing in these renewables and turning a profit. Soon enough Texas will be a global leader in using renewable energies. Plans are even in the making to install the first off-coast wind turbines in the country, near Galveston.
Peak oil in this country was reached in the seventies. Global peak oil is right around the bend. Even though the wind doesn’t always blow and the sun doesn’t always shine, these renewable energies hold the key to our future. I am excited about the development of cleaner, renewable energies. However, I am not excited to think that our state of Kansas is still sitting on it’s head over the coal issue, when we too could be reaping the wind.
Thanks to siemens.com for the photo.
Thanks to youtube.com for the video.
Filed under: Energy + Climate, Food + Health, Society + Media | Tags: beef, corn, corn subsidies, feedlots, high-fructose corn syrup, modified corn starch, obseity, vegetable wax
Dinner’s ready and what’s on the table?
Corn, corn, and more corn!
Made possible by evolutionary advantage and government subsidies, these fields of sweet golden ears have risen to God-like status on the agricultural hierarchy. Monocultures of the stuff wave in the Midwestern wind, testaments to our conversion from dinner table to feedlot. Its abundance have allowed it to manifest in most of the foods we eat, an addition that has made the modern diet of fast, processed, and cheap food possible. The consequences of our corn worship, however, has lay waste to human health.
Our self-induced corn-fed daze is not unlike that of another American food icon: the cow. Though naturally grass-eaters, cows are switched to a diet of hormones, antibiotics, and corn at a young age in order to “beef up the beef,” you might say. Simply, cows need calories and corn is calories. It’s only economical, to maximize calories and minimize costs, isn’t it?
We now know, in our waistlines and in the nutrition of our beef, that cheap corn calories is not a alliteration we want to use. The low cost of corn allows for the low cost of processed foods– products targeted and affordable to those with low incomes, those who now make up a large percentage of America’s obese. Likewise, corn-fed beef contains a more saturated fats and requires more antibiotics to combat their corn-created health problems.
We hail corn as the new king crop, the solution to an increasing population, and the answer to our fossil fuel problem. Yet I fear that this new king may be Ozymandias himself in disguise, ready to lay waste to the environment and our health in order to build artificial monuments in his name.
Filed under: Energy + Climate, Food + Health, Nature + Travel, Waste + Recycling | Tags: compost, curbside recycling, organic, soil enrichment, yard waste
My backyard is a perennial disappointment. Every spring my excitement for summer builds with false hope of home grown tomatoes, cucumbers, and reconstructing my mother’s vegetable garden. Year after year I am forced to face the unfortunate fact that nothing thrives in my yard other than the onion weeds that waft the stentch of morning breath with the summer breeze. The canopy of trees hovering over my house provide an oasis of cool shade but do not allow the sun to reach the forsaken garden site below. Despite all the misgivings of my current location, there is one outdoor project that my yard is perfect for… composting!
About one third of household waste is compostable. Combine that with the curbside recycling I recently signed up for and I’ve reduced my landfill waste to one small bag per week! Composting is easy to do and the result is nutrient rich material that will fortify your garden. All you need to get started is organic waste, minus meat and dairy, and some space. Some compost piles are enclosed, but they don’t have to be. Compost bins can be purchased or easily constructed out of chicken wire, lumber, old pallets, or fencing. Other useful tools to have on hand are a garden hose, wheel barrow, and common gardening tools. A 4 x 4 x 4 foot area out of direct sunlight and easily accessible on a grassy or soil base is ideal for your compost pile. Mix your organic materials together and add water as needed to keep the materials moist. Your compost pile should be turned over about once a month, except in winter. The compost is ready when it is dark and crumbly and none of the starting ingredients are visible. With compost you can grow flowers and vegetables without fertilizer and boost the nutrient content of your soil. Happy composting!
Filed under: Energy + Climate, Local Events + Action, Society + Media, Waste + Recycling | Tags: greenpeace, New york Times, toilet paper
It’s something you don’t really think about… unless you’re using it. We’ve all noticed uncomfortable, rough toilet paper before, whether it’s at a restaurant or somewhere on campus. It’s easy not to think about the price of the soft, comfy toilet paper if that’s what you’re used to. But the environmental costs of the softest brands will make you think twice next time you need to go.
Greenpeace recently put out a Tissue Guide that ranks different toilet paper brands based on their recycled content and impact on the environment. In order to get the soft, plush toilet paper most Americans prefer, you have to get fiber from standing trees. This can often lead to cutting down old-growth trees in rainforests for nothing but the use of toilet paper. An article in the New York Times said that European countries were usually satisfied with rougher toilet paper, and used toilet paper with almost explusively recycled content. Why isn’t think something we accept, and why isn’t it something people think about more?
The Greenpeace guide said Americans could save more than 400,000 trees if each family bought just one roll of recycled toilet paper. One roll? That doesn’t seem so hard. I think a lot of people, myself included sometimes, can get stuck in a green “rut,” thinking that recycling cans and using canvas bags are the only things we can do to help the environment. But there’s always something else you can do to help the environment last, even if it’s just wiping your…. ya know.